TV Review: The Crown, Season 2

I’ve been looking forward to the second season of The Crown* ever since my parents, sisters, and I finished the first one–albeit it with certain reservations. I’d heard that at least one of the episodes in Season 2 was quite smutty, and while I enjoyed the first season, I took issue with the way it portrayed a few of the characters–Queen Elizabeth the Queen Mother, in particular.

While I still have those same objections and caveats (that seventh episode was really bad) I found the second season just as fascinating as the first one…but not quite as enjoyable.

Based on an award-winning play (“The Audience”) by showrunner Peter Morgan, this lavish, Netflix-original drama chronicles the life of Queen Elizabeth II (Claire Foy) from the 1940s to modern times. The series begins with an inside look at the early reign of the queen, who ascended the throne at age 25 after the death of her father, King George VI. As the decades pass, personal intrigues, romances, and political rivalries are revealed in events that shaped the later years of the 20th century. — Google synopsis

The first season of The Crown* ended with Queen Elizabeth II and her husband Prince Philip on rocky matrimonial ground. Her sister Princess Margaret had just been denied marriage with the divorced Captain Peter Townsend, while Britain braced for conflict in Egypt over the Suez Canal.

Elizabeth officially declaring Philip her Prince Consort.

Season 2 opens with Philip preparing for his grand tour in the southern hemisphere. Lo and behold, he and Elizabeth actually seem to be on good terms. But any hopes for marital stability unravel when the wife of Philip’s personal secretary accuses her husband of adultery–while Elizabeth, in turn, finds a picture of a ballerina in Philip’s briefcase. Between that and the accusations that the secretary/BFF has been fooling around, Elizabeth fears her own husband might have veered off the straight and narrow.

(FACT CHECK: Was Prince Philip unfaithful to Queen Elizabeth II? Nobody knows for sure. The Palace has categorically denied it, of course, but they would. We probably won’t know for sure until both Prince Philip and the Queen are long gone and biographers are permitted a deeper peek into Palace correspondence and classified materials. I do think The Crown: Season Two* does a very good job of handling the unknown with a tasteful and ambiguous delicacy.)

I don’t know why Margaret complains about not being a queen when she is THE Queen of Drama…

Between Philip and Margaret, poor Elizabeth has her hands full of drama. Margaret, thankfully, plays a much smaller role in this season, but she still gets two whole episodes devoted to her and to her new boyfriend, Anthony “Tony” Armstrong-Jones. And regardless of the fact that he’s played by Matthew Goode, he is REPULSIVE. (I really need to watch Leap Year again so I can recall the good ol’ days when Matthew Goode played a nice boy.)

Elizabeth meeting with her new Prime Minister, Harold MacMillan.

Meanwhile, the Queen continues to grow, stumble, learn, and adapt in her role. She also continues to deal with troubled Prime Ministers. After the Suez Canal crisis, Anthony Eden leaves 10 Downing Street a broken and brittle man; enter his successor, Harold MacMillan, whose pomposity conceals a deep grief over his own wife’s unfaithfulness. Most of the political drama of this season centers around Eden and MacMillan’s scandal-ridden governments. But even Elizabeth soon finds herself the focus of harsh criticism–much of it more constructive than she initially thinks–when she delivers a tone-deaf speech written by ultra-traditionalist private secretaries.

Yet my favorite episode, “Vergangenheit,” shows her at her finest, as she learns of her uncle David’s involvement in Nazi plots to defeat  England during World War II. This isn’t artistic license, either: David (briefly known as King Edward VIII before his abdication) and his American wife really did have treasonous connections with the Nazis. Overwhelmed with anger, Elizabeth turns to her new friend, Billy Graham, for counsel. Graham and the Queen did meet on several occasions, and while we don’t know if they discussed this issue, I couldn’t have been more pleased with the way the writers handled it. They could’ve easily made Graham a Bible-thumping caricature, or downplayed Queen Elizabeth’s well-documented faith. Instead, Graham is portrayed a man of great sensitivity and respect, and his counsel and Elizabeth’s resolve to balance justice and mercy see her safely through. 

Elizabeth preparing to meet the Kennedys.

This episode (like the seventh episode of Season One*, “Scientia Potentia Est”) remind me why I admire Elizabeth II so much. This fictionalized retelling of her history draws heavily on what we do know of her character: soft-spoken and introspective, dutiful and long-suffering. She always strives to do the right thing by her family and her country, yet she hates conflict and worries about what others think of her (as seen in the episode “Dear Mrs. Kennedy”–she feels upstaged and ineffective compared to the far more glamorous Jacqueline Kennedy).

But when it comes time to stand her ground and speak up, Elizabeth doesn’t hesitate. As we see several times in both seasons of The Crown, Elizabeth can be the fierce and majestic Queen she was absolutely born to be. It just takes her some time to work up a conviction that she is doing the right thing, no matter how unpleasant or painful it might be.

In this house we support Philip and Elizabeth being adorable (and we wish we got more of it, especially since Matt Smith playing a jerk is very disturbing to us Whovians).

If you’re interested in The Crown: Season Two*, I can recommend it only with strong caveats: both of Margaret’s episodes (#4 and #7) had some very inappropriate scenes, I’m still enormously displeased with the way the show portrays the Queen Mother (who was actually a very kind and jolly woman), and there are at least 3 F-bombs (all uttered by Tony Armstrong-Jones). Because of these issues, I didn’t find it as enjoyable as Season One*. But it’s a solid successor that ends on a MUCH happier note! The final scenes are so heartwarming, and the last thirty seconds or so absolutely hilarious.

P.S. Goodbye, Claire Foy and Matt Smith. I am sorry you’re being re-cast for the next season. You were both marvelous.

2 thoughts on “TV Review: The Crown, Season 2

  1. Great review! That’s colossal amount of informal to put into one review. We seem to have the same sentiments regarding season 2.

    Margret was so aggravating, rude and completely determined to undermine her sister in everything she did. She thought she was being strong and independent, but just came off as petulant and spoiled. And the whole “I was Daddy’s Favorite,” quip was so over the top. George loved both of his girls equally!

    I also agree about Tony too. Just a despicable person all around. He made Philip look like a choir boy.

    Vergangenheit was my favorite episode too. I had heard about King Edward’s (David) possible schemes with Hitler, but had never gone into really studying it. And the role that Billy Graham played was remarkable, as well as touching on Elizabeth’s faith in such a respectful way.


    1. So glad you liked the review! 🙂

      Ugh, YES–Margaret seems determined to upstage her sister constantly, and from what I’ve read, that’s 100% accurate. Apparently Margaret was spoiled rotten (I love George VI and the Queen Mum, but they did spoil her) and she threw tantrums anytime she thought Elizabeth was receiving some “advantage” over her. Elizabeth couldn’t even start dressing her age once she turned 16 because everyone was afraid Margaret would through a fit and insist on dressing older, too! Margaret was only 12! But Elizabeth had to keep dressing like a little girl just because everyone was afraid of a 12-year-old?!?! It’s really infuriating to read about. And you gotta love the way Margaret twists and perverts her father’s originally beautiful sentiment of “Elizabeth is my pride AND Margaret is my joy.” (Can you tell I am utterly unsympathetic? XD)

      (*snickers over your comment about Philip looking like a choir boy*) It’s true, though XD

      I remember reading about Edward and Wallis’ Nazi connections in William Shirer’s The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich. It’s really very well-documented. When Edward and Wallis vacationed in Miami during the war, even Franklin Roosevelt kept them under close FBI surveillance. England’s role in the war might’ve looked very different if Edward had stayed on as king.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.